So I was asked by PR Week on Monday for my views on Gordon Brown’s Ask the PM initiative on YouTube. This was the latest foray into the online world by Downing Street, following its recent embrace of Twitter. My assessment that Ask the PM “smacks of gimmickry and desperation” led the article and there was a clear consensus from other industry commentators, that this project was a typical case of ‘too little, too late’.
I had a couple of interesting conversations on Friday in response to the piece. These boiled down to the argument that as a Social Media evangelist I should have welcomed the initiative, however imperfect, as a step in the right direction. Sorry to disappoint.
I have come to a view, which has hardened in recent months, that high profile examples of digital tokenism such as Ask the PM, are actually devaluing the real potential of Social Media. They are feeding a scepticism which makes the pioneering work we are doing unnecessarily difficult.
A couple of years ago, the medium was the message when it came to organisations adopting Social Media. This was typified by those endless stories in the national press, with leading youth brands like IBM and PA Consulting opening virtual offices in Second Life. Today, the filter I always use when assessing Social Media initiatives, my own and others, is whether the communication objectives and creative approach are actually more interesting than the digital platform(s) being utilised.
Using this filter, Ask the PM just doesn’t cut it. It’s not a genuine attempt by Gordon Brown to reconnect and really start listening to a disillusioned electorate. His comment at the end of his welcome video, where he states, “I’ll be back to talk to you at some point…” betrays a total lack of understanding of the two-way conversation that Social Media enables. You may as well write a letter and stick it in the post – you’d probably get a quicker reply!
In my mind the YouTube channel, the Twitter feed and whatever online gimmick is announced next, is primarily about metaphor, the hope that some shiny digital zeitgeist will rub off on an increasingly lacklustre Prime Minister. Equally, it’s a clumsy attempt by the new Downing St communications team to ‘get with it’ and reduce the gaping void between their digital approach and that of the Opposition.
As I have been saying a lot this week in new business pitches, Social Media is not a magic wand. Ultimately whatever Stephen Carter and his team try to do, Gordon Brown at heart, will always remain an analogue politician in a digital age.
6 Comments so far
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


[...] Writes Like She Talks by Jill Miller Zimon wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt So I was asked by PR Week on Monday for my views on Gordon Brown’s Ask the PM initiative on YouTube. This was the latest foray into the online world by Downing Street, following its recent embrace of Twitter. My assessment that Ask the PM “smacks of gimmickry and desperation” led the article and there was a clear consensus from other industry commentators, that this project was a typical case of ‘too little, too late’. I had a couple of interesting conversations on Friday in response to the [...]
Pingback by Don’t Ask the PM about Social Media | Politics in America May 24, 2008 @ 2:33 pmI think you do right in your harder line view; social/new media doesn’t benefit from token gestures, of treating it as an new form-old style broadcast medium.
I wonder whether we’re seeing another stage in political communications; just as Macmillan struggled with TV even those in the US Presidential race have struggled with YouTube debates and the like (though McCain has been diligently courting the blogosphere for a couple of years).
Am still enjoying the grass roots work of groups such as “Why Tuesday?” and the like; far preferable to the tokenism (and politically opportunistic) examples such as this from poor Mr Brown.
Comment by Paul Campy May 25, 2008 @ 11:10 pmTasmania has a Generation X politician according to the post here
David Bartlett, 40 years old and only 4 years in politics. Hiw new deputy, Lara Giddings, is 36. Both represent the first burst of Generation X political leadership in Australia.
Bartlett apparently has had a successful career in IT and intellectual property before entering politics. He summed up his vision for the State that he will now be leading, describing the future he wanted to create for citizens as “clever, kind and connected”.
http://www.theconnectedrepublic.org/blog/?p=91
Comment by alex May 27, 2008 @ 1:13 amEnjoyed the post and some food for thought. I can sympathise with those who said engaging in social media is a step in the right direction, since the entire sphere needs advocates / adopters to reach tipping point and thus adopted by more.
However, the more we see projects executed badly the more we learn how to and how not to do it. The social media space is still in its infancy (when it comes to corporates) and the rules are not fully defined yet. Mistakes will be made and execution will become better.
Comment by Yeelim May 27, 2008 @ 1:49 amVery much agree with this… Politicians have started to understand that something more than a website with pages of information on it is necessary, but getting them to do more is a hard task. Especially on the Labour side no one has quite forgotten the Mandelson-inspired 1997 Labour message, the grid, etc. – social media is a lot more scary as it’s less controllable.
Comment by Jon Worth May 28, 2008 @ 10:54 pm[...] such a project than it is for them to actually relate to and use the thing itself. Just look at the problems Gordon Brown has with Youtube – it’s just not a natural part of the psyche for most [...]
Pingback by Jon Worth May 30, 2008 @ 3:56 pm